Interestingly, the rumor sites got it so wrong this time.
* heavy distortions -> they said minimal
* $1100 -> they said $1600
* it's small -> they said a size similar to the 24-105G
But yes, given that it's "just" a G and the results from the 16-35G, it's hardly surprising that there are heavy distortions at 20mm.
Still, I will get it ASAP. I reckon it'll help me to have a two-lens setup for traveling rather than 3.
* heavy distortions -> they said minimal
* $1100 -> they said $1600
* it's small -> they said a size similar to the 24-105G
But yes, given that it's "just" a G and the results from the 16-35G, it's hardly surprising that there are heavy distortions at 20mm.
Still, I will get it ASAP. I reckon it'll help me to have a two-lens setup for traveling rather than 3.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji