• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Which denoiser?
#1
The past year, after Klaus' praises, I evaluated the DxO PureRAW 3 denoiser. It did a good job on a few critically noisy photos I shot. Before that evaluation I didn't think that I really needed a denoiser, but having tried one changed my mind. Then I left the trial expire because I didn't have the time to evaluate competing applications. One year and a half later I was able to do a round of comparative testing: Topaz Photo AI, On1 NoNoise AI and the latest DxO PureRAW 4. At this point I need to pick one and buy a license. My personal evaluation is that PureRAW is still the best of the pack: some competitors might produce sometimes sharper images, and maybe offer the capability of better sharpening when the problem is not noise, but slight mis-focusing; but often the images they produce look unnatural and/or there are digital artefacts. 

Anyway, before buying a license I'd like to hear your comments, if you have experience.

PS For people who are interested but never tried an evaluation, these might be two starting points — but consider that both the video and the post are from about seven/eight months ago and in the meantime more recent versions have been released, so you really need to try yourself. All the products have free trials.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp5HIUmudAs

https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1844182/0
stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)