• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > next OL lens test - Laowa AF 12mm f/2.8 FF II Zero-D
#1
https://opticallimits.com/nikon/nikon-z/laowa-af-12mm-f-2-8-ff-ii-review/

Pretty good actually
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com

Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
  Reply
#2
My 10mm is still in the repairs. Hope their newer AF lenses have a better reliability against failure; that or maybe I was uniquely unfortunate. Big Grin
The 180mm macro sure looks interesting, because for some reason, no one has been making any AF macro lenses longer than 100/105mm for... ages? Certainly none for any of the mirrorless mounts, IIRC.
  Reply
#3
I agree ... but then do you really need AF for macro?
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com

Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
  Reply
#4
Probably, as I can't focus manually to save my life. At least not in the timeframe that would've been required to save my life, lol.
  Reply
#5
(07-02-2025, 02:25 AM)Klaus Wrote: I agree ... but then do you really need AF for macro?

    Well if your macro lens is just used for macro, yes .... but 85/105/150/180/200mm macros are useful for portraits as well as telephotos .... my will never sell Sigma 150mm F2.8 macro gets more use as a portrait lens ... 

  Btw slightly OT ... I was thinking how well the Samyang 14mm F2.8 which had excellent resolution to the corners would fare on a 45Mp sensor (don't panic I not asking for a review Smile  )  ....
 
      .. it's distortion of 5.2% was almost considered a deal breaker back in the day .... these days it would barely covet a mention with a reference to turning on lens corrections ...  it also has the best bokeh I've ever seen on a ultra wide angle lens, truly soft and the distortion is not a big deal on the D500 .... 

     now where was I?     Smile
  Reply
#6
I think the Samyang 14mm was tested in E mount and it wasn't super hot.
  Reply
#7
I don't think it's the same lens (+ a built in extension) ... the new lens is too short for that ... distortion is lower on the RF 3.8% vs 5.2% DSLR version .. 3 aspherics (RF) vs 2 on the DSLR etc etc ....

The corners are only poor on the RF) vs very good (DSLR) .... I expect to see a drop for sure but that difference seems a awful lot ....
  Reply
#8
Ah, so you were talking of the old DSLR lens.
  Reply
#9
Well yes .... the smoke and mirrors version ....

davethebirder = MLonlooker ....

king of lost passwords ... Smile
  Reply
#10
The style is unmistakable. Smile But I thought you could recover passwords?
Anyway, I thought the old MF Samyang lenses have been discontinued long ago.
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)