08-23-2016, 01:05 AM
Well, apart from the fact that I also think that the second portrait row has the cameras swapped, I'd say that the V1 does an excellent job considering it costs 1/10 (of course, if one considers that 8MP are enough). The problem - which is one of the reasons I didn't consider it - is the incapability of having a shallow DoF at full aperture as bigger sensors have (I mean: at least MFT sports some very fast lenses, such as f/0.95). True that I mostly do landscapes, but also flowers.
PS I hope I'm not spreading FUD... but many have noted this comment by DPreview:
PS I hope I'm not spreading FUD... but many have noted this comment by DPreview:
Quote:
(we're leaving Nikon 1 cameras out of the list, as we believe the series is no longer being developed.)
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.