08-23-2016, 07:47 AM
I was referring to the very nervous bokeh with 32 mm @ f/2.8. I think, the more modern 85/1.8 G will be equally sharp at f/2.8 and still deliver better background blur. Plus cheaper...
I already was looking at EXIF and I concluded the pictures were in the order like the descriptive text. But the second portrait row was not.
I understand all the topics the Series 1 is a very good or better option. What you could add is highspeed shots (1/16.000 is not bad, 60 fps as well and 20 with AF-C...). My main concern is not, the system is not capable, not after I saw your first pictures years ago, but still, I need fast lenses and here the system sucks.
I already was looking at EXIF and I concluded the pictures were in the order like the descriptive text. But the second portrait row was not.
I understand all the topics the Series 1 is a very good or better option. What you could add is highspeed shots (1/16.000 is not bad, 60 fps as well and 20 with AF-C...). My main concern is not, the system is not capable, not after I saw your first pictures years ago, but still, I need fast lenses and here the system sucks.