Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS
#4
Quote:I'd say that a f/2.8 lens is usually always better than a f/1.8 lens.
 

I doubt this statement, especially because you can't decide between "always" and "usually". Either one or the other  Wink

 

I also doubt that in terms of bokeh there are a lot of 70-200 lenses beating this Sigma speciality. But I think one needs to decide: For portraits FF and a zoom - hands off the Sigma 50-100. For APS-C a very nice portrait zoom: very different story, although same weight, same price. I'd at least give it a try before I'd say no to it. And I would use FF for portraits.
  


Messages In This Thread
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Klaus - 05-20-2016, 11:31 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by Rover - 05-23-2016, 02:36 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 03:37 PM
Sigma 50-100 f1.8 ART vs 70-200f2.8 IS - by JJ_SO - 05-23-2016, 07:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)