05-25-2016, 11:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2016, 11:09 AM by Brightcolours.)
JoJu, every time you write in regards to AA-filters you keep showing a lack of the underlying theory.
And then there is the odd remark about the shadow pulling fad, linking it not not blowing highlights? Strange.
A typical "normal" scene has 7-8 stops of DR, in "normal contrast".
That gives a lot of room in 10 or 11 stops of DR in RAW.
When i mention the odd shadow pulling fad, I am of course not talking about highlights. I am talking about the nonsense of pulling shadows 3, 4, 5 stops "to see detail".
Unattractive images that result are indeed an odd fad.
fad
<div>
<div><i>noun</i>
<ol class="">[*]
<div style="margin-left:20px;">
<div style=";">
<div>an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, especially one that is short-lived and without basis in the object's qualities; a craze.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</ol></div>
</div>
And then there is the odd remark about the shadow pulling fad, linking it not not blowing highlights? Strange.
A typical "normal" scene has 7-8 stops of DR, in "normal contrast".
That gives a lot of room in 10 or 11 stops of DR in RAW.
When i mention the odd shadow pulling fad, I am of course not talking about highlights. I am talking about the nonsense of pulling shadows 3, 4, 5 stops "to see detail".
Unattractive images that result are indeed an odd fad.
fad
<div>
<div><i>noun</i>
<ol class="">[*]
<div style="margin-left:20px;">
<div style=";">
<div>an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, especially one that is short-lived and without basis in the object's qualities; a craze.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</ol></div>
</div>