12-24-2015, 10:46 PM
Well Dave, I did sort of the same experiment with a Nikkor 85/1.4G two days before. You may reason whatever you want, but I saw the Nikkor failing as well in PDAF. I'm sorry for the ones who can't adjust their findings to mine, all I can say is: I took it for granted PDAF is faster and reacts better in low light. What I saw during the last days tells me a different story..
The Sony is tempting, indeed but I have to sell a kidney for it and like you stated, I also suspect rapid firing updates. Beneath 1000 $ that could be okay, for 3500 + I'm listening to a traumatized purse
No, I looked a couple of times into the Fujis, PZ lens tests, other sources, sample pictures and I think, for a start as travel (lightweight) camera, an XE-2 will do fine.
Also, this
The Sony is tempting, indeed but I have to sell a kidney for it and like you stated, I also suspect rapid firing updates. Beneath 1000 $ that could be okay, for 3500 + I'm listening to a traumatized purse
No, I looked a couple of times into the Fujis, PZ lens tests, other sources, sample pictures and I think, for a start as travel (lightweight) camera, an XE-2 will do fine.Also, this
Quote:Others talk ALL the time. Can't help, but even if that'd be true, the Sigma lenses are still better than their Nikon pendants...
Others talk about problems because of their reverse AF engineering