[JJ_SO]

Read the very top of this section:

http://www.opticallimits.com/Reviews

I know that, but nonetheless both are full frame, the Sony has a couple more megapixels and there's another tester who redid the tests because he was sure they did it stopped down. And then he was almost cheering about the sharpness of that lens - wide open sharper than some other wellknown candidates.

 

Roger Cigala was comparing that lens on A7R to a D800e with 35/1.4 G and Zeiss 50/2.

 

 

<b>MTF50 Center LP/IH</b> <b>MTF50 Avg LP/IH</b> <b>MTF50 Avg Corner Lp/IH</b>

 

<b>A7R</b> 35mm f/2.8 FE f/2.8 1320 1175 695

<b>A7R</b> 35mm f/2.8 FE f/4 1420 1190 750

 

<b>D800e</b> 35mm f/1.4 G f/4 1150 1020 625

<b>D800e</b> ZF.2 50mm f/2 f/5.6 1260 1100 660

I know, different apertures and he also recommends a grain of salt because of different systems, but still... and PZ is confirming this sharpness. But obviously Klaus has reasons to give 3 stars. I'm just curious about those reasons...