Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next PZ lens test report: Tokina AF 17-35mm f/4 AT-X Pro FX (Nikon FX)
#12
Quote:<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mst" data-cid="22092" data-time="1361652791">
Personally, I'd prefer the Nikon because of its faster aperture and AF-S.


However, you'll have to pay considerably more for the Nikkor, unless you find a heavily used one (which I'd hesitate to buy).

Currently I am using 20mm f4 and 35mm f2. The only reason I look in to this option is to avoid lens change. 2 weeks ago I was taking pictures of a dunes, wind was calm, but I figured out that if it wasn't I couldn't change lenses. Any suggestions besides N 17-35?


-- Markus
</blockquote>
Currently I am using 20mm f4 and 35mm f2. The only reason I look in to

this option is to avoid lens change. 2 weeks ago I was taking pictures

of a dunes, wind was calm, but I figured out that if it wasn't I

couldn't change lenses. Any suggestions besides N 17-35?

Some how my post mixed with yours...
  


Messages In This Thread
Next PZ lens test report: Tokina AF 17-35mm f/4 AT-X Pro FX (Nikon FX) - by borisbg - 02-25-2013, 09:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)