+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 (/showthread.php?tid=3625)
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - Klaus - 09-29-2010
A very good lens albeit somewhat pricey ... [url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/555-zeisszm35f2nex"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/555-zeisszm35f2nex[/url]
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - Brightcolours - 09-29-2010
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285739919' post='3344']
A very good lens albeit somewhat pricey ... [url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/555-zeisszm35f2nex"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/555-zeisszm35f2nex[/url]
[/quote]
Nice lens, would look much better on the silver Nex, though. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> "As of the time of this review Sony does not [color="#FF0000"]over[/color] a native standard lens for Sony NEX cameras so it makes sense to look a bit beyond the obvious horizon."
Over should be offer, typo.
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - mst - 09-29-2010
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1285761354' post='3353']
Nice lens, would look much better on the silver Nex, though. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> [/quote]
Well, it's also available in black (actually most ZM lenses are available in both colours). So you can pick the version matching your NEX <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />-- Markus
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - neolam - 09-29-2010
guys....is it worth to buy this Biogon 35mm F2 ZM pair with NEX5??
coz i am selling my a700 to fund for this...can u guys tell me any disadvantages besides manual focus
because i think this is not a problem for me....thanks!!
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - Klaus - 09-29-2010
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285771998' post='3361']
guys....is it worth to buy this Biogon 35mm F2 ZM pair with NEX5??
coz i am selling my a700 to fund for this...can u guys tell me any disadvantages besides manual focus
because i think this is not a problem for me....thanks!!
[/quote]
Markus prefers the ZM 35mm f/2.8 (yet to be tested) but the f/2 has quite some fans out there.
We'll also test the V35/1.2 in November if you've a need for speed ...
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - mst - 09-29-2010
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285772246' post='3362']
Markus prefers the ZM 35mm f/2.8 (yet to be tested) but the f/2 has quite some fans out there.
[/quote]
Yes, but that's on full frame, not APS-C. The 35/2.8 does have smoother bokeh and it's a bit smaller (roughly the size of the Summarit 50/2.5).
Compared to these two the V35/1.2 is a monster lens ...
-- Markus
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - neolam - 09-29-2010
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1285772860' post='3363']
Yes, but that's on full frame, not APS-C. The 35/2.8 does have smoother bokeh and it's a bit smaller (roughly the size of the Summarit 50/2.5).
Compared to these two the V35/1.2 is a monster lens ...
-- Markus
[/quote]
bro...between this 3 lens which one is better??
u said tht V35/1.2 is monster is in terms of size or image quality??
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - neolam - 09-29-2010
and i found out the C Biogon does have better image quality....so guys u recommend me to go for which lens??
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - mst - 09-29-2010
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285772974' post='3364']
bro...between this 3 lens which one is better?? [/quote]
Well ... define "better" <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />The 35/2.8 is cheaper, smaller, has nicer bokeh. That's what counts for me. They are both sharp on the M9 (actually almost any lens I have tried so far is sharp enough for my needs on the M9).
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285772974' post='3364']
u said tht V35/1.2 is monster is in terms of size or image quality??
[/quote]
Size. Cannot really comment on its image quality, yet. Got it just recently and since then haven't had any opportunities to seriously use it.
-- Markus
next PT lens test report: Zeiss Biogon ZM T* 35mm f/2 - neolam - 09-29-2010
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1285775477' post='3366']
Well ... define "better" <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />The 35/2.8 is cheaper, smaller, has nicer bokeh. That's what counts for me. They are both sharp on the M9 (actually almost any lens I have tried so far is sharp enough for my needs on the M9).
Size. Cannot really comment on its image quality, yet. Got it just recently and since then haven't had any opportunities to seriously use it.
-- Markus
[/quote]
coz i am using the lens on NEX5...so which one u recommend me to go for??
my definition for "better" are which one suits NEX 5 more?? i know the image quality for both 35mm are very good...