01-07-2017, 02:25 PM
No worries, Rover, I don't mind at all, in fact I'm really glad for your's (and other's) hints, very welcome!
-- Markus
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com
|
01-07-2017, 02:25 PM
No worries, Rover, I don't mind at all, in fact I'm really glad for your's (and other's) hints, very welcome!
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
01-07-2017, 04:47 PM
Quote:Well, not sure that's going to happen soon (we haven't discussed it internally so far though). However, if I had to choose a high res system for myself (and if Nikon doesn't come up with a higher res body this year I might have to), the Fuji could be tempting. Let me know if you do decide to switch to GFX, I may have an idea on how to get you one for a more reasonable price
01-08-2017, 04:43 PM
Apparently, you got it all wrong. Should've said it's the best lens ever.
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/24-70mm-g...ks-either/
01-08-2017, 05:49 PM
Quote:Apparently, you got it all wrong. Should've said it's the best lens ever.<ROFL> Then there is the comment about PZ, specifically Klaus, being biased against Sony <ROFL>. Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
01-08-2017, 09:31 PM
When LensRentals tests a lens, it's "oh you can't put 10 lenses on a testing bench, you have to do real photography". When Photozone does it, it's "they got a single bad copy and now giving the lens a bad name".
01-09-2017, 07:43 AM
Added near-center values.
01-09-2017, 10:17 AM
Quote:Added near-center values. Now they'll say that instead of admitting your mistake, you added more values that humiliate the glorious Sony GM lens that is the best 24-70mm lens ever made by anyone.
01-09-2017, 11:16 AM
You can't change reality. numbers are numbers.
That's what makes photozone such an unbiased and reliable source. Once again thanks Klaus for the excellent effort.
01-09-2017, 01:10 PM
Quote:You can't change reality. numbers are numbers.I would always be careful what I measure. Astrology and economics use numbers too. ;-) Actually I don't understand the fuzz, the review was quite positive. It's a quite usable lens with some drawbacks but nothing you cannot work around.
01-09-2017, 01:17 PM
Quote:I would always be careful what I measure. Astrology and economics use numbers too. ;-) :lol: You don't want to say, they're not accurate? All the horoscopes I read are precise, it depends just from the view you take. |