02-06-2012, 05:16 PM
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1328544793' post='15541']
Well,
The 35mm. AF mount is here for a while. There is not inovation in this area. It is clear that in sertain moment that 3-th party lenses will overtake the OEMs. Like japan and Koeran cars have overteken the western cars.
- The most profesional photogrpaher find the 24....70 range boring, but them again there are plenty of reach amateurs who are ready to pay premium price for such lens. please call me old fashion guy, but I cannot understnad what can you do with IS/VR in this focal range. One is sure the VR/IS will gratly reduce the lifespawn of lens. On the other side there lot of reach guys ready to pay $$
- What about sigma 105,150,180/2,8 OS macro - it just another hole in the wall
- what about sigma 120-300/2,8 os - again no reaction
[/quote]
Miro, I agree with most of your points, BUT if your customers wants something, give it to them and take their money. Otherwise they will spend them to somewhere else.
Boris
Well,
The 35mm. AF mount is here for a while. There is not inovation in this area. It is clear that in sertain moment that 3-th party lenses will overtake the OEMs. Like japan and Koeran cars have overteken the western cars.
- The most profesional photogrpaher find the 24....70 range boring, but them again there are plenty of reach amateurs who are ready to pay premium price for such lens. please call me old fashion guy, but I cannot understnad what can you do with IS/VR in this focal range. One is sure the VR/IS will gratly reduce the lifespawn of lens. On the other side there lot of reach guys ready to pay $$
- What about sigma 105,150,180/2,8 OS macro - it just another hole in the wall
- what about sigma 120-300/2,8 os - again no reaction
[/quote]
Miro, I agree with most of your points, BUT if your customers wants something, give it to them and take their money. Otherwise they will spend them to somewhere else.
Boris