02-27-2012, 05:12 PM
Well, the full-res samples look quite soft, the sensor clearly outresolves the lens, however downsampled to 5 mpix pictures do look bitingly sharp and colourful - massive oversampling clearly pays off <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Funny enough, if we my maths are correct, having an ideal diffraction-limited lens at f/2.4 with 1/1.2" sensor and calculating the resolution using Rayleigh criterion (as opposed to MTF-50), maximum resolution actually would be around ~38 megapixels <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
![Smile Smile](https://forum.opticallimits.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
Funny enough, if we my maths are correct, having an ideal diffraction-limited lens at f/2.4 with 1/1.2" sensor and calculating the resolution using Rayleigh criterion (as opposed to MTF-50), maximum resolution actually would be around ~38 megapixels <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />