09-15-2017, 11:41 AM
Ah, there we go again... we rate low, we're too critical or biased, we rate high, we're too generous 
Even if it's "just" a 50mm prime, there are definitely 50mm primes performing worse.
And it's debatable if 75mm is a less "classic" focal length than 90mm. It just has become uncommon outside of the rangefinder world (in full-frame contexts). Personally, I'd prefer it over the 60mm with its outdated AF drive. In fact, a X-Pro with both the 23/2 and the 50/2 would be very tempting to replace my current Leica setup.
P.S.: thx for the hint, will check...
Even if it's "just" a 50mm prime, there are definitely 50mm primes performing worse.
And it's debatable if 75mm is a less "classic" focal length than 90mm. It just has become uncommon outside of the rangefinder world (in full-frame contexts). Personally, I'd prefer it over the 60mm with its outdated AF drive. In fact, a X-Pro with both the 23/2 and the 50/2 would be very tempting to replace my current Leica setup.
P.S.: thx for the hint, will check...
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com