06-29-2021, 03:10 PM
(06-28-2021, 09:56 PM)Klaus Wrote:(06-28-2021, 05:41 PM)Brightcolours Wrote: Is it worse than with the Canon RF 24-240mm lens (which is actually a nice lens, but you have to use the lens correction for 24mm)?
https://www.photoreview.com.au/wp-conten...G_0095.jpg
wow, no, it's not THAT bad.
Yeah, this is what uncorrected looks like:
https://dustinabbott.net/wp-content/gall...rected.jpg
And this is what 24mm corrected looks like:
https://dustinabbott.net/wp-content/gall...raming.jpg
(from this review: https://dustinabbott.net/2020/04/canon-r...is-review/ )
So, the resolution must take quite a hit at 24mm.
If I would have an R6 or R3, this would probably be my "standard zoom", accompanied by some native and adapted primes of various ilk. Not because it needs so much correction at the wide end, but because it is a versatile, relatively affordable lens with quite good results for stopped down photography. But since I don't have any RF camera, I don't have to worry about that ;-)