vignetting: 12.6 f-stops at f/4 and 12.4 f-stops at f/11
Or in other words - beyond anything that Imatest can still measure.
That's without distortion and vignetting correction.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Going on with this pace, you'll soon run into a lens whose corners are a black hole... :o)
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Well, in all fairness - on the R6 (20mp) it's probably a good lens - if you follow the recipe.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
You will get the juicy horror this week. ;-)
In all fairness - this lens was never meant to be used on an R5 and it is surely nice on an R6 (but then what isn't ...).
And it served a good purpose - we now know what peak vignetting is. ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Is it worse than with the Canon RF 24-240mm lens (which is actually a nice lens, but you have to use the lens correction for 24mm)?
https://www.photoreview.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Vignet_24mm_MG_0095.jpg
The cheaper way is digital correction, those black corners will be cropped out in distortions correction anyway, but still better have it fine straight out of the beginning.
(06-28-2021, 05:41 PM)Brightcolours Wrote: Is it worse than with the Canon RF 24-240mm lens (which is actually a nice lens, but you have to use the lens correction for 24mm)?
https://www.photoreview.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Vignet_24mm_MG_0095.jpg
wow, no, it's not THAT bad.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji