Login at opticallimits.com

Brightcolours · 10-06-2019, 08:52 AM

It is sharp, it actually is corrected for distortion (Sigma, thanks!) and renders nicely. Who cares about LoCA indeed.

toni-a · 10-06-2019, 08:31 PM

Lens tested at 16MP, maybe if MFT adopt Sony 47MP sensor, would this lens still shine ?

**Klaus** · 10-07-2019, 04:46 AM

As far as the pixel density is concerned the 16mp MFT sensor is equiv to 67mp FF.

Brightcolours · 10-07-2019, 06:05 AM

(10-06-2019, 08:31 PM)toni-a Wrote: Lens tested at 16MP, maybe if MFT adopt Sony 47MP sensor, would this lens still shine ?

No.

you2 · (This post was last modified: 10-07-2019, 03:51 PM by you2.)

(10-06-2019, 08:31 PM)toni-a Wrote: Lens tested at 16MP, maybe if MFT adopt Sony 47MP sensor, would this lens still shine ?

Well these things are relative. Since it is just about the best lens with regards to resolution for the 4/3 to date it would probably be in the top 3 (unless there is something odd about the 47MP sensor that makes it particularly bad for this lens) so in that sense it would shine but I suspect it might not max out the sensor - and if it doesn't one would have to ask would any lens take advantage of such a sensor full resolution ?

(10-06-2019, 08:44 AM)Klaus Wrote: I just added the LoCA samples (but I don't always provide this - and I rarely did so for MFT lenses).

Zero LoCAs aren't REQUIRED for 5/5. There's no such thing as absolute perfection. Mostly the rating is driven by the MTFs and this combined with the quality of the bokeh is certainly sufficient for a 5-star rating.

Thanks for adding the additional test. Well not as bad as some lenses but still rather annoying. I suppose most folks just correct it in software and forget it exist but I still like the idea of a 5/5 being a perfect lens which would require apo behavior Wink