Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
The picture of the swallows is badly noise reduced, the canoeing image does not show good sharpnes anywhere really, but bad background bokeh (just look at the canoe in the back). Then there is that awful photo of shrubs near the water with a bird flying up, where the bird appears to be the subject but the camera did not focus on the bird... That is the 600mm images I came across.
Posts: 7,776
Threads: 1,780
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
37
If these 4 images are a reflection of the capabilities I'd call myself lucky that I didn't preorder ...
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
07-29-2020, 10:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2020, 10:56 AM by Brightcolours.)
I agree, especially the 600mm shots are ridiculous snapshots that make little sense.
Posts: 2,999
Threads: 157
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
14
07-29-2020, 05:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2020, 05:45 PM by davidmanze.)
I wondered why my internet was running slow ..... bogged down by people cancelling their 600mm F11 orders no doubt!
useless images!
Dave's clichés
Posts: 7,776
Threads: 1,780
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
37
07-29-2020, 05:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2020, 06:02 PM by Klaus.)
Inconclusive - these images are just way too small (2 megapixels ...)
Nice shots though (I mean the quality of the work)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji