09-14-2021, 09:32 AM
Do vloggers use super wide angle lenses for vlogging? (Asking for a dinosaur friend)
|
|
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1STP3mliy6GVsa9tuwLVcmWvMsNtTxVnJ/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mn2FkSWSIFXquO67IwzxBYFqYTw_5TsI/view
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji 
09-14-2021, 09:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2021, 10:06 AM by Brightcolours.)
Yeah, the two lenses have already appeared on Canon Australia's website on the RF lens page, just when you click on the "view lens" button, you end up on an "OOps!
The page you're looking for can't be found" page. And a few minutes later: they can be found. https://www.canon.com.au/camera-lenses/rf-16mm-f2-8-stm https://www.canon.com.au/camera-lenses/rf-100-400mm-f5-6-8-is-usm
09-14-2021, 10:07 AM
This is interesting "69.2mm x 40.2mm (when lens retracted)" ... retracted ...
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
09-14-2021, 10:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2021, 10:29 AM by Brightcolours.)
MTF and lens construction (link from my dpreview gallery images):
![[Image: 1B7BC738A54F4E32BD59A3536C7802FE.jpg]](https://g2.img-dpreview.com/1B7BC738A54F4E32BD59A3536C7802FE.jpg) Sample images RF 16mm f2.8: On EOS R6, f8 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf16-f28/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-popup.jpg On EOS R, f9 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf16-f28/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-02-popup.jpg On EOS R6, f2.8 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf16-f28/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-03-popup.jpg Sample images RF 100-400mm f5.6-8 IS USM: On EOS R6, 100mm, f5.6 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf100-400-f56-8/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-popup.jpg On EOS R6, 400mm, f8 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf100-400-f56-8/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-02-popup.jpg On EOS R6, 400mm, f8 https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf100-400-f56-8/image/image-sample/image-sample-media-img-03-popup.jpg
Hmmh, the MTFs of the 16mm look ... crap.
The 100-400mm seems half-decent.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
09-14-2021, 11:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2021, 11:24 AM by Brightcolours.)
(09-14-2021, 10:48 AM)Klaus Wrote: Hmmh, the MTFs of the 16mm look ... crap. Yes, it is definitely not an Irix 15mm f2.4 or Sigma 14mm f1.8. But then again, it does beat the Sony 16mm f2.8 APS-C lens hands down. (09-14-2021, 09:32 AM)Kodachrome 25 Wrote: Do vloggers use super wide angle lenses for vlogging? (Asking for a dinosaur friend) Tell your dinosaur friend: yes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r0GuXYx_LY  (09-14-2021, 10:48 AM)Klaus Wrote: Hmmh, the MTFs of the 16mm look ... crap. Let's say they look like what we were afraid they'd look like  (09-14-2021, 10:07 AM)Klaus Wrote: This is interesting "69.2mm x 40.2mm (when lens retracted)" ... retracted ... Likely hinting that it's not an IF design. I doubt it means 'retracted' the Nikon way.
Editor
opticallimits.com
09-14-2021, 05:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2021, 05:24 PM by Brightcolours.)
Like how the EF-M 22mm f2 STM works. It puts itself in the shortest position when powering down/getting unmounted from the camera (to prevent damage of the AF gears).
See this video at 1:02 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jza1xYSuIg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jza1xYSuIg&t=157s
It would be interesting to see the MTFs at f/8. Haven't found them yet. The performance at f/2.8 is not all THAT interesting here.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji |
Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)