[quote name='RussellB' timestamp='1333212308' post='17231']
Klaus it feels like an imposition to ask you to do a real test of the 16-50/2.8 Sony lens on a Nex 5n. But could you mount the lens on a Nex 5n for a minute, take one tripod picture of something that's corner focused at F/2.8 at each of a couple of focal lengths, and just verbally/roughly compare those wide open corners against Nex 7 corners?
Just to appeal to your apparently well-developed sense of intellectual curiosity.
[/quote]
The problem is ... I have no 5n.![[Image: mellow.gif]](http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/default/mellow.gif)
However, you can already draw some basic conclusions from the 16mm test on the NEX 5. And the NEX 5 sensor is surely inferior to the 5n.
Klaus it feels like an imposition to ask you to do a real test of the 16-50/2.8 Sony lens on a Nex 5n. But could you mount the lens on a Nex 5n for a minute, take one tripod picture of something that's corner focused at F/2.8 at each of a couple of focal lengths, and just verbally/roughly compare those wide open corners against Nex 7 corners?
Just to appeal to your apparently well-developed sense of intellectual curiosity.
[/quote]
The problem is ... I have no 5n.
However, you can already draw some basic conclusions from the 16mm test on the NEX 5. And the NEX 5 sensor is surely inferior to the 5n.