28/1.8 is pretty popular but the other two...? Not sure they're of any use now with their 2.8 aperture (not better than many zooms) and dated build. Probably not up to the modern standards of IQ either. If I'd been a FF user on a budget I'd rather get a Tamron 28-75 for not much more or a Canon 28-135 IS or something along these lines... Or just wait a bit more and get a body/lens kit.
Klaus has stated more than once that his time is limited and schedule is tight, so I'd rather see him not waste on lenses that have so little practical value. Of course, a "joke review" like [url="http://kurtmunger.com/minolta_af_35_80mm_f_4_5_6_shutter_cap170.html"]this one[/url] would be nice for a change. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Klaus has stated more than once that his time is limited and schedule is tight, so I'd rather see him not waste on lenses that have so little practical value. Of course, a "joke review" like [url="http://kurtmunger.com/minolta_af_35_80mm_f_4_5_6_shutter_cap170.html"]this one[/url] would be nice for a change. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />