02-09-2012, 11:52 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1328786511' post='15736']
[color="#0000ff"]Because of their compact size.[/color] That's of course not a reason for anyone, but at least for a few (the older versions were mostly no hot sellers, too).
Still, both became quite expensive, unfortunately.
-- Markus
[/quote]
I wonder whether this and IS doesn't mean we can expect something interesting on the camera front from Canon soon? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Especially taking into account that these lenses would do admirably well on APS-C (or even APS-H) based on their MTF-charts....
Kind regards, Wim
[color="#0000ff"]Because of their compact size.[/color] That's of course not a reason for anyone, but at least for a few (the older versions were mostly no hot sellers, too).
Still, both became quite expensive, unfortunately.
-- Markus
[/quote]
I wonder whether this and IS doesn't mean we can expect something interesting on the camera front from Canon soon? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Especially taking into account that these lenses would do admirably well on APS-C (or even APS-H) based on their MTF-charts....Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....