01-06-2012, 01:11 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1325854706' post='14407']
It is similar to the original database you had many years ago. I woudl actually prefer a bit more spacing between the lenses and marginally larger font.
I think what a lot of places do is first list zooms (or primes) then follow with primes (or zooms). I'm mixed as to whether primes/zoom should/should not be mixed.
[/quote]
Yes, this gave an outcry the last time I tried it. :-)
Sebastian came up with the idea of grouping zooms and primes - this would be possible.
However, I suspect that the sorting by name/or focal length will not be optimal because it will be sorted by string and not by number.
It is similar to the original database you had many years ago. I woudl actually prefer a bit more spacing between the lenses and marginally larger font.
I think what a lot of places do is first list zooms (or primes) then follow with primes (or zooms). I'm mixed as to whether primes/zoom should/should not be mixed.
[/quote]
Yes, this gave an outcry the last time I tried it. :-)
Sebastian came up with the idea of grouping zooms and primes - this would be possible.
However, I suspect that the sorting by name/or focal length will not be optimal because it will be sorted by string and not by number.