12-14-2011, 06:38 AM
http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-C...e-Zoo.aspx
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
Olympus 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 announced
|
12-14-2011, 06:38 AM
http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-C...e-Zoo.aspx
Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one.
12-14-2011, 07:32 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='[url="tel:1323844684"]1323844684[/url]' post='13736']
[url="http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-Cameras/PEN-Lenses/M-Zuiko-Digital-12-50mm-f3-5-6-3-Standard-Wide-Zoo.aspx"]http://www.olympus.c...d-Wide-Zoo.aspx[/url] Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one. [/quote] But it seems to have a constant physical length.
12-14-2011, 08:21 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1323847937' post='13737']
But it seems to have a constant physical length. [/quote] furthermore it's fully sealed against dust and moisture aaand... it is available in black <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
12-14-2011, 09:37 AM
[quote name='Sebastian' timestamp='1323850895' post='13742']
furthermore it's fully sealed against dust and moisture aaand... it is available in black <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> [/quote] A cool feature - 0.7x max. magnification based on a floating system design. 211g Actually a perfect lens for hiking it seems.
12-14-2011, 09:53 AM
Its only 0.36x, the 0.72 value is a "35mm equivalent". Since they are happy to apply these "35mm equivalent" multiplication factors to maximum focal length and now macro, why not be consistent and also advertise the equivalent aperture...
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1323855460' post='13746'] A cool feature - 0.7x max. magnification based on a floating system design. 211g Actually a perfect lens for hiking it seems. [/quote]
12-14-2011, 09:54 AM
[quote name='Ayoh' timestamp='1323856404' post='13749']
Its only 0.36x, the 0.72 value is a "35mm equivalent". Since they are happy to apply these "35mm equivalent" multiplication factors to maximum focal length and now macro, why not be consistent and also advertise the equivalent aperture... [/quote] Ah, ok.
12-14-2011, 10:10 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1323844684' post='13736']
[url="http://www.olympus.com.au/Products/PEN-Cameras/PEN-Lenses/M-Zuiko-Digital-12-50mm-f3-5-6-3-Standard-Wide-Zoo.aspx"]http://www.olympus.c...d-Wide-Zoo.aspx[/url] Well, it may be a great lens but it is certainly not a small one. [/quote] MTFs: http://asia.olympus-imaging.com/products...mtf_02.gif Not bad (remember that they provide the MTFs at 60lp/mm) but not better than for the 14-42 actually.
12-14-2011, 10:12 AM
57 mm Ø, 83 mm is still pretty small.
Olympus executives have been siphoning off money for a long time. Now it seems, they've stolen a stop of aperture from this lens as well (should've been f/3.5-4.5 or something to be interesting, methinks <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />).
12-14-2011, 02:10 PM
Strange mixture of specs. I won't come back on the long end <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> but quite interesting otherwise. I appreciate the new 12mm wide end and more importantly, I cross my fingers it's announcing new bodies with hopefully a g3 like sensor and the matching weatherproofing *smiles at fond memories of scotland and the constant shuffling of plastic bags*
Still not on the matching simulator |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |