04-13-2011, 04:32 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1302674561' post='7577']
I'm sure I will. Unforuntately, that doesn't make the lens any better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
-- Markus
[/quote]
Hi Markus,
Just to add, that your finding are absolutely in line with slrgear: http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showprodu...360/cat/13 and they tested two copies. So don't worry about the fanboys and fangirls <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
To me it builds some confidence in the test results, if different lens testers come to compatible conclusions on a given lens. Typically I find that the case between photozone and slrgear. Most of the time, if either of you declares a lens to be a dog, the other site follows and similar for a good result. Gives confidence that the bottom line of your and their efforts has some significance beyond sample variation.
I'm sure I will. Unforuntately, that doesn't make the lens any better <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />-- Markus
[/quote]
Hi Markus,
Just to add, that your finding are absolutely in line with slrgear: http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showprodu...360/cat/13 and they tested two copies. So don't worry about the fanboys and fangirls <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />To me it builds some confidence in the test results, if different lens testers come to compatible conclusions on a given lens. Typically I find that the case between photozone and slrgear. Most of the time, if either of you declares a lens to be a dog, the other site follows and similar for a good result. Gives confidence that the bottom line of your and their efforts has some significance beyond sample variation.
enjoy