04-07-2017, 10:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2017, 10:19 AM by Brightcolours.)
You have your equivalences in a bunch.
32mm x 2.7 = 86.4mm.
f1.2 x 2.7 = f3.24
About unnecessary bulk: Meaning specifically the huge width of the smaller aperture lenses, due to the wide mount with no point, the wide choice of "standard barrel" which does not relate to the small sensor. It makes the lenses unnecessarily big for this small system, and visually "fat". Which did not help sales much.
As seen on the 30-110mm, the 11-27.5mm and even the AW 11-27.5mm, the 10-30mm, the 10-30mm PD, 6.7-13mm, 18.5mm.
32mm x 2.7 = 86.4mm.
f1.2 x 2.7 = f3.24
About unnecessary bulk: Meaning specifically the huge width of the smaller aperture lenses, due to the wide mount with no point, the wide choice of "standard barrel" which does not relate to the small sensor. It makes the lenses unnecessarily big for this small system, and visually "fat". Which did not help sales much.
As seen on the 30-110mm, the 11-27.5mm and even the AW 11-27.5mm, the 10-30mm, the 10-30mm PD, 6.7-13mm, 18.5mm.