[Studor13]

You have your equivalences in a bunch.

32mm x 2.7 = 86.4mm. 

f1.2 x 2.7 = f3.24

 

About unnecessary bulk: Meaning specifically the huge width of the smaller aperture lenses, due to the wide mount with no point, the wide choice of "standard barrel" which does not relate to the small sensor. It makes the lenses unnecessarily big for this small system, and visually "fat". Which did not help sales much.

 

As seen on the 30-110mm, the 11-27.5mm and even the AW 11-27.5mm, the 10-30mm, the 10-30mm PD, 6.7-13mm, 18.5mm.

 

Unfortunately, what you wrote is the sort of thing that confuses people.

 

85mm or 86.4mm is the same as far as making an image goes.

 

f1.2 is f1.2. It is NOT f3.24. But you know that but you want to add to the confusion, right? Yes, the dof is f3.2 but the lens is still an f1.2 lens. No need to multiply it by 2.7.

 

I don't have the AW lenses but to suggest that the 30-110mm is “fat” really shows the effect of fake news. The J5 is easily the smallest 1 camera and yet the 30-110mm is more or less the same width as the body. Remember, this is like a 80-300mm lens. 

 

I once had the Sony NEX-5. You would be horrified how “fat” the 18-55mm kit lens is.