[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285836204' post='3383']
can you explain about the worse shallow depth-of-field potential??[/quote]
A faster lens allows for narrower depth-of-field, so better separation of the main subject from the background. Obviously a slower lens (f/2.8 instead of f/2 or f/1.2) has less potential in this regard.
However, if you prefer to have as much depth of field as possible and stop down anyway, this is not really an issue.
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285836204' post='3383']
why dont you review the Z35/2.8??
[/quote]
Klaus will leave for a holiday soon, the ZM 35/2.8 review on the NEX is scheduled for later this year. Same applies to the V35/1,2 and (hopefully) the new V75/1,8.
-- Markus
can you explain about the worse shallow depth-of-field potential??[/quote]
A faster lens allows for narrower depth-of-field, so better separation of the main subject from the background. Obviously a slower lens (f/2.8 instead of f/2 or f/1.2) has less potential in this regard.
However, if you prefer to have as much depth of field as possible and stop down anyway, this is not really an issue.
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285836204' post='3383']
why dont you review the Z35/2.8??
[/quote]
Klaus will leave for a holiday soon, the ZM 35/2.8 review on the NEX is scheduled for later this year. Same applies to the V35/1,2 and (hopefully) the new V75/1,8.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com