09-30-2010, 10:25 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1285839132' post='3387']
A faster lens allows for narrower depth-of-field, so better separation of the main subject from the background. Obviously a slower lens (f/2.8 instead of f/2 or f/1.2) has less potential in this regard.
However, if you prefer to have as much depth of field as possible and stop down anyway, this is not really an issue.
Klaus will leave for a holiday soon, the ZM 35/2.8 review on the NEX is scheduled for later this year. Same applies to the V35/1,2 and (hopefully) the new V75/1,8.
-- Markus
[/quote]
but i think Z35/2 and Z35/2.8 both depth of field potential should not very big difference right??
so you think which lens should i go for cause i can only get one lens...
A faster lens allows for narrower depth-of-field, so better separation of the main subject from the background. Obviously a slower lens (f/2.8 instead of f/2 or f/1.2) has less potential in this regard.
However, if you prefer to have as much depth of field as possible and stop down anyway, this is not really an issue.
Klaus will leave for a holiday soon, the ZM 35/2.8 review on the NEX is scheduled for later this year. Same applies to the V35/1,2 and (hopefully) the new V75/1,8.
-- Markus
[/quote]
but i think Z35/2 and Z35/2.8 both depth of field potential should not very big difference right??
so you think which lens should i go for cause i can only get one lens...