[davidmanze]

I watched the 1st part and only noticed that they were more testing AF-C than anything else, and Canon with video chooses the make SMOOTH transitions which make it so nice for video, and use different algorithms for photo subject tracking.

So. What do you want? You said the Sony had everything perfect for vlogging. That is what I reacted to. That you now "attack" what I wrote about with totally other things in mind, is just the moving goal post I mentioned. And as I pointed out, the 6D mk II is NOT the camera to use when looking how AF compares (even though it does rather well anyway).

Yes, the Sony does many things well. And the Canon M6 mk II has its own plus points too.

And I do not understand why one would feel the need for IBIS over in lens IS for vlogging, at all.

 There's smooth and missed it ..... certainly the A6600 did better than the 6D II .......which is already pretty good ..... there will be a slew of comparisons soon .... so we will see... I see no benefit trying to convince otherwise.
  Sure the old problem of jello still exists .....  we will need faster scan speeds for any improvement there certainly.
  But 700-800 shots per battery ..... face /eye AF which works  etc.
  
 So, let us be patient and see the facts ..... I have no dog in this fight as I shoot Nikon .... Sony's tech though is fascinating that's for sure..... tech interests me .... and Sony is all about tech.

You either don't read, or you are trolling me?
Vlogging is about video. Not about missing the action shot. Canon's PDAF is the best for video, and you posted about vlogging.

The 6D mk II is not the best/fastest PDAF photo AF implementation from Canon. Which is a totally different discussion.

---

I watched the 1st part and only noticed that they were more testing AF-C than anything else, and Canon with video chooses the make SMOOTH transitions which make it so nice for video, and use different algorithms for photo subject tracking.

So. What do you want? You said the Sony had everything perfect for vlogging. That is what I reacted to. That you now "attack" what I wrote about with totally other things in mind, is just the moving goal post I mentioned. And as I pointed out, the 6D mk II is NOT the camera to use when looking how AF compares (even though it does rather well anyway).

Yes, the Sony does many things well. And the Canon M6 mk II has its own plus points too.

And I do not understand why one would feel the need for IBIS over in lens IS for vlogging, at all.

 There's smooth and missed it ..... certainly the A6600 did better than the 6D II .......which is already pretty good ..... there will be a slew of comparisons soon .... so we will see... I see no benefit trying to convince otherwise.
  Sure the old problem of jello still exists .....  we will need faster scan speeds for any improvement there certainly.
  But 700-800 shots per battery ..... face /eye AF which works  etc.
  
 So, let us be patient and see the facts ..... I have no dog in this fight as I shoot Nikon .... Sony's tech though is fascinating that's for sure..... tech interests me .... and Sony is all about tech.

You either don't read, or you are trolling me?
Vlogging is about video. Not about missing the action shot. Canon's PDAF is the best for video, and you posted about vlogging.

The 6D mk II is not the best/fastest PDAF photo AF implementation from Canon. Which is a totally different discussion.

 Yes I do read and no I'm not trolling ! (a loathsome word IMHO)

  Maybe I got it wrong but the linked video was about vlogging/video was it not?